To giving big relief to the successful
students in 53-55 PT Examination in its much awaited judgment Patna high court
directed BPSC to reevaluate the answer sheet of PT examination on the basis of
the model answer given by the second expert committee.
Order also directed the BPSC
to exempt the successful candidate as they have already filled their mains
form.
According to interpretation
of this judgment few thousand new candidates will get qualified as per affidavit filed by BPSC in the court.
BPSC has also got green
signal to conduct the mains examination with this judgment.
Copy of the Judgment:
Contributed by :Rakesh Verma
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/judgment/pdf.aspx?ord=7&noc=15&caseno1=13022&yr=2011
Copy of the Judgment:
Contributed by :Rakesh Verma
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/judgment/pdf.aspx?ord=7&noc=15&caseno1=13022&yr=2011
128 comments:
tripathi jee biiikkk gaye kya
re-evaluation kyon.
jab safal ,safal
fail ,fail
cut-off wohi
ye kaisa judgment tripathi jee?
Congratulations to 588 candidates
588 kaise aaayyeeenge.
kis cut-off par.
kya purane wale cut-off par.
nainsaafiii hai bhai
kameena nikala ye Tripathi. Mein to hamesha se bol raha tha he is a worthless fello
sahi kaha dosto tumne
let's go in for double bench now. This is gross injustice that a human being could perpeptrate on another fellow human being. This Justice Tripathi must be impeached by the Parliament for this miscarriage of justice
CONGRATULATIONS TO BPSC,
GAND MANDD DALA FAIL WALO KA
FOR TAKING IN ITS FAVOUR THE JUDGMENT
BY HONBLE TRIPATHI JEE
JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED
ab to sant ho jao fail walo
ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaa
bpsc ne dikha diya aukaat
ratish jee congrats bpsc ko dijiye.
judgment jo unke favour me gaya hai.
sahi hai na
tension mat le Mains ub 2015 mein hi hoga, we will take the case to double bench within a week. Your joy is short lived only
ALL THE BEST MY FRIEND
WE ALL R WITH U MAN
LETS FIGHT THE CORRUPT COMMISSION.
its all against the direction given by supreme court.
lets move to double bench.
we could not have hoped for a better judgement from this worthless judge who slept on our judgement for more than a month playing golf.
double bench jane se kya hoga?
waha to do-do tripathi baitha hoga.
direct supreme court hi chalte hai.
we should collect fund for Supreme court now as the expense is likely to be huge and we all should be wiling to share that
ok it would not be problem. we all should share
Thank god justice have been done. .. atlast..
who will collect fund just clear it.
i am with you.
what do you mean from justice..
its not justice
let's have someone who is well-known and lives in Patna as the Fund Manager along with 2-3 other fellows and let's contribute generously towards it so that we may take this matter to a logical conclusion. Money should not be allowed to come in the way of our quest to justice
ISSE PEHLE BPSC XAM KI SOCHE, V SHUD TAKE UP THE CASE...
PLS SOME OF U VOLUNTEER BEHIND WHOM V ALL COULD COME..
AND ALSO TELL ..HOW FUNDS TO BE SUBMITTED..
IT IS GROSS UNJUSTICE.....
V VE 2 FIGHT AGAINST IT
No word has come out on behalf of BPSC regarding the criteria for reevaluation. So I think they have a lot of discretionary power in this regard, and this number of 588 candidates getting benefitted is merely a speculation.
IN SUCH CASES GENERAL ESTABLISHED PRINCIPLE IS ...AS PER AR 21 RT 2 LIFE ....BENEFICIARY SHUD B STUDENTS ....AND IT IS MISTAKE OF BPSC, NOT OF STUDENTS....
AND LOGIC THAT REVALUATION IS NOT APPLICABLE 2 CLEARED ONE IS ALSO NOT JUSTIFIED.
PLS PASS ON ACC NO ...SOME HONEST AND YOUNG LOCAL VOLUNTEER IS NEEDED..
LETS SEE..WHO WINS
Look judges has done a meeting and prior to consultation to pronounce the verdict.
Double bench will also be a money making work for Cauncil Maman kumar he will be the final winner because he will get all the fund collected by desperate students.
Keep funding him ....
all the best
I VE HEARD THAT PREVIOUSLY TRIPATHI WAS OK WITH 3 MARKS REDUCTION BUT WHEN OUR ADVOCATE INSISTED ON 9 MARKS AND TOLD 2 GO 2 NEXT HIGHER COURT, THIS BASTARD GOT ANGRY AND FINALLY GAVE THIS JUDGEMENT...
absolutely. Judgement has no meaning and cannot stand the scrutiny of higher courts. So local guys come forward and assume responsibility like Anna Hazaare. We all will be there with you till the end
judgement copy is on patna high court website.read it
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/judgment/pdf.aspx?ord=7&noc=15&caseno1=13022&yr=2011
in which new expert has recommend for deletion of new three more questions.
I just had a conversation with our Vakil Mishraji and as per him this figure of 588 getting successful is absoutely ridiculous
new expert committee has also give wrong suggestions.
new expert committee has also given wrong suggestions.
in judgement copy all wrong question are mentioned as per new committee.
jab yahi judgement tha to mains exam pe stay kyu laga tha.
Billion dollar question is what should be our next move???????????
why judge is giving guard to previous successful candidates? just because they already filled form for mains examination.
wats this ground..cant understand. why re-evaluation process is not applicable to them.
Are keya karna hai....
Jo pas hai wo mains pe lagee...
and jo fail haiwo pt me lag jayen
Result shud be only 6500 as per UPSC. BPSC is vr liberal in declaring 15000 result. u ppl shud thanks BPSC. JUDGMNT IS GOOD ENOUGH..
wah bhai wah bahut accha kaha, 1 BPSC liberal aur doosra tu liberal baaki duniya to Illiberal aur undemocratic hai
this judgement is against more than 400 writ petitions.
sabhi 400 candidate sath mil kar bpsc aur tripathi ki gad mar denge..
look u ppl dont hv any level and class. thats why u hv failed.see ur comments do u feel u hv any quality of administrator.
wat is your class man. your statement is totally like a chor and corrupt.
we all are fighting against corrupt people like you. so you are telling like this. that why you are behaving like administrator man.
yaar judgement bikk gaya hai.
Justice done!!!
let's plan our next move carefully instead of getting lost somewhere else. We have to focus on our cherished goal of getting justice
post card bhejna hoga.
sabhi writ karne walo ko.
address judgment me hai friends.
400 se jada hai writ karne wale.
move double bench
or perish
atlast no uncertainty...
ranjit is right .
Tumlog unhee ladte raho... Are ghar pe next PT ki tyariii karoo.... Es baar to Exam ho jane do.. next time achche se tyari kar ke exam dena...
justice tripathi jee sayad pagal ho gaye hai.
aisa judgment se to achha tha ki writ cancel kar de te.
vested interest is ther or tripathi is of unsound mind
@Tumlog unhee ladte raho... Are ghar pe next PT ki tyariii karoo.... Es baar to Exam ho jane do.. next time achche se tyari kar ke exam dena.
REPLY;
sale tum mains me aise hi girgiraoge.
tub jakar tum samjho ka ki sdm kaise ana jata hai
sale tum mains me aise hi girgiraoge.
tub jakar tum samjho ka ki sdm kaise bana jata hai.
meri ye baat dhyan rakhna.dost
tumhari sari garmi sant ho jaaayeegi
SDM RATE IS 25 LAKH
NAHI NAHI IT IS 55 LAKH
Ths decision is absolutely wrong...agar re-evaluation hoga to sabka hona chaiyeh...tripathi jee paisa khaye hai ka...pagla gaye hai tripathi jee....
APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL
how long will take the next judgement if we go in for appeal now and the honourable justices donot happen to be kaamchor like this fellow Tripathi? Anyway, I do not think Mains is going to be held in 2012
new expert committee recommendation would not be acceptably by anyone as like JPSC.
YE 1 Tripathi jaise Macchar ne laakhon candidiates ki umeedon pe paani pher diya
frnds dont pay attention 2 some who r coming in bet with some irritating comments .....just concentrate on next move..this judgement is quite strange and language of judgement it self is funny where he is not sure what he wants 2 convey...at one point he says that bpsc wants 2 clear many by reducing cut off but he himself is against it.and what more principle of eqality..when he says reevaluation is not applicable 2 passed one. even solution of expert commitee r wrong ..so v shud win..
right Nararesh. There are too many inconsistencies in the judgement and we can derive hope from this
i hope locals shud take stay tomorrow only...and plan carefully
v all r wid u....
or shall we protest in Front of Tripathi's House and BPSC like Anna Hazaare??
usse kuch nahi hoga..coz its judicial matter.....not executive one...kahin apna case kharab na ho jaaye....
Mr tripathi judgement is like HRD minister Kapil Sibal's statement.
sahi kaha....giving clean chit to bpsc ....and accusing candidates only
judgment hai,or writ khariz ho gaya, pata nahi chal raha
pehle student ki bhasa bolne wale tripathi jee ko aisa kya ho gaya ki ek mahine baad bpsc ki bhasa bolne lage
cut off would be 99..qki 5 question ke sath cherchar ki gyi h..i m sure.....99 for general
sujeet
Rakesh ji theek bol rahe hein, is baat ki CBI inquiry honi chahiye
bhai log jpsc ka kya hua?? any news....plz....
CUT-OFF kum hone ka koi sign or symptom nahi hai mere bhai
thik hai 588 new entry ho rha hai lekin 915 exit na ho jaye isske liye 3 no. to cut-off kam karna hi hoga.
are bhai 915 bahar nahi hoga cuki unka re-evaluation hi nahi hona hai..
jai ho tripathi jee...
915 main waise log bhi hoge jinka pahle 3 delete question sahi hoga aur ab wahi 3 question delete hone ke karan 3 no. mines(-) kar rha ho aur idhar dono question (jo pahle delete kar diya gaya tha ab sahi maan liya gaya hai) bhi galat ho.
. When the Court questioned the learned
senior counsel representing the Commission as to what would
be the fall-out if the evaluaition of the answer sheets is made
now by deleting nine questions and accepting two quesitons
with correct and definite answers, on the basis of some
exercise carried out by the Commission, they come with a
rough figure that 915 candidates who have already been
declared successful on the basis of earlier evaluation will stand
ousted and many more new candidates would be declared to
be successful;
tripathi jee discriminate kar rahe hai;
appeal hona hi hoga
915 KO SAVE KARNE KE LIYE
PURI 400 WRIT PETITIONS KO FAIL KAR DIYA TRIPATHI NE
EITHER RE-EVALUATION FOR ALL
OR FOR NONE
DATE;15/7/2011 INJUSTICE TO ALL OF US
NOW;
DATE;04/01/2012;
AGAIN INJUSTICE TO ALL OF US
PEHLE COMMISSION AUR AB TRIPATHI NE SARMASAAR KAR DIYA BIHAR KO
Tumne khud fail ho ke bihar ko sharamshar kiya hai.
JPSC ki tarah BPSC ke new expert committee ka report bhi galat hai. usne bhi pahle se jada galat answer diya hai.
KYA COMMITTEE KO SARE ANSWER NCERT KE BOOK ME MIL GAYE.
Gen ka cutoff 90 hona chahi yeah. mera 91 hai.
SALE PAHLE SDM BAN JA TO PHIR BOLANA..
now I am inviting Anna And Arvind Kejriwal to fight our case
Kal tak subko hope thaa, aaj wo hope bhi humse chheen liya is kameene Tripathi ne
Hello bhai saheb, is baar SDM ki ek bhi post nahi hai.. aph kis duniya mai rahtai hai.
post nahi hai to kya hua, create karwaa lenge
hum jahan pe khade ho jaayenge wahin se SDM ki Vacancy suru ho jaayegi
new committee ke anusar sabhi baccho ka marks kam hoga jise BPSC ne pahle allot kiya hai kyu ki naye committee ne ek new sahi question ko galat tharaya hai aur jo pahle galat tha wo galat hai..
A very good comment at anubhuti srivastava blog:
At the very onset I want to congratulate 600 odd aspirants who will get chance to participate in the mains. Tough luck for those who deserved to be in but could not get chance due to worst system prevailing in our country especially in Bihar. Hard work never goes in vain!
As regards to Justice Tripathi he has to survive himself. That’s why he killed time and was always in favour of respondents in this case! Even when they accepted their mistake at this level. Perhaps his career progression depends on General Administration of Bihar that’s why! If not so why he always gave time to Commission and it’s so called experts. Perhaps the single judge who rightly gave judgment during 48-52nd BPSC Examination was honest one. But the result was, his judgment was reversed by double bench.
There was an incident in previous batch perhaps 42nd batch of BPSC wherein a data entry operator kept on daily rated basis had wrongfully (hopefully) missed names of 16 top reserved category aspirants and they were not called for viva. But as he was not so called expert his mistake was taken note of and aggrieved candidates got justice! This is not applicable for these super experts! They are privileged ones. In the judgment that followed those who wrongfully got higher ranks were not given appointment letters. Even some were left out after revision.
Is not it funny that Justice Tripathy is saving those who have already filled forms of mains and that is why some odd 600 are getting chance. What a judge and what a judgment?
Wish me luck for mains and if I am unable to get through the tough competition and unprecedented obstacles of the system I will be back to try my luck in the next batch.
Together we can change the system! If there is will
Plz tell which question ans hv been changed...
tension mat le yaar, so jaa, long judicial route still waiting
pass walo ke copy ke jaanch dubara nahi hogi ! kya yahi justice hai.
matlab pass walo ke guh ko nahi geja jayega.
how many of you losers babbling here have actually cast an eye upon the entire judgement?
It is a misery that those who dont even have the brains and language skills to read a 45 page document in english language, are looking forward to becoming civil servents.
Jisko lagta ho ki ye case double bench mein le jana chahiye wo jara apne wakeel se kah dena ki judge ne jo past precedences apne decision mein mention kiya hai un past cases ko ek bar dekhne ke baad hi koi step lena.
Jyadatar petitioners aur unke lawyers to judgement pura padhne se pahle hi hawaa mein kila bana rahe hain.... Lekin ek bar pura decision padhne ke baad hi is case per aur paisa fookna tum log.
You tropical baffoons, no wonder most of you spend your entire lives taking rounds to courts and still end up as losers.
Tum log bane hi ho shasit hone ke liye aur usme bhi nakaam rahte ho and you suffer your entire life due to your lack of proper basic education.
D.p.s. Delhi ka koi 5th grade kid bhi decision dekhe to bata dega ki koi higher bench is verdict ko oppose nahi karegi.
Lekin tum log thahre V ko "vhi" pronounce karne wale jahil.......arey jao jakar koi job notice dekho aur uske exam ke liye padho.
Over age ho jaoge tab kiske khilaf appeal karoge
Chup kar bengali... ja kai bengal ka exam dai.
Rudra Das ko yeh nahi pata ki apne Bihar ka class 1 ka bacha bhi yeh kah sakta hai ki judge ke faisle mein bahut mistake hai
Mineral wala question is basis pe hata diya ki NCERT ke tahat matbhed hai.Last mein judgment mein yeh kah diya ki NCERT ko basis banana bachkana hai.Head ya tail ke basis pe decision hai.Ha!ha!ha!
thandh rake bete Rudra Das. Abhi mains itni jaldi nahi hone doonga
appeal in double bench will be soon,read www.prabhat-ranchi.blogspot.com
same article was shared on www.sabkakalyan.blogspot.com ,basically from telegraph
What type of Judiciary is this? Yeh kaise experts hain.Jo jo galtiyan batai jaati hain usi ko sudharte hain ya nahi sudharte hain. Successful candidate kya hai. Suppose in case of General category pahle kisi ka 104 marks the (jo ki cut-off hai).Ab 3 questions further delete huen. Maan lijiye uske yeh sahi the ab reevaluation mein delete karne se 3 marks kam honge.2 questions pahle deleted the ab sahi mana gaya. Maan lo yeh bhi uske galat. Minus further 2 marks.Maan lo doosre candidate ka yeh sahi ho.Salinity wala option change huaa uska woh bhi galat ho gaya. Yaani total 6 galat. 104 se seedhe 98 ab bolo. Kya yeh successful hoga after reevaluation.
Case of an unsuccessful candidate
Pahle ke result mein 96 marks.2nd experts ke 3 deleted questions uske galat the. Now marks as it is yaani 96.Two corrected from previous deleted sahi the. Marks now 98.Salinity wala bhi correct. Total marks 99. Bhai iska kya hoga.
Wah re judgment?
Are gadho judgement me kya galat hai? Bpsc ko out honewale 915 passed ko bachane ke liye 6800 result nikalna hoga. Samjho ki 6800 gadhe ghode gai bakri bhi pass.
are 915 gadho ko bchane ke liye hi 6800 ghore aa rhai hai!
itne kabil hote to judge ko gali nahi dete
Dear unscful friends! I can understand ur grief of failure n ur attempt to get justice.bcz i was in ur category a few yr b4.frnds this is civil n these type of failure happens.so dont get discourage n loose patience.u have to work on ur prep.find ur loopholes.solve previous ques.u will get sure success in pre.i guranttee.never look in past or never give attention to those who critisize u 4 being fail.listen what ur heart says.open ur ques paper and see why some ques u do wrong.revise those chapter.u will get ample apportunity in future.up,mp,36garh,rajsthan r going to open their new vacancy.dont loose them.remember all successful in civil,even toppers,were failed once b4.if u learn 4m failure then failure is success.dont forget u will be winner at last,but that depend on u.
Well said but I want to add something more. To fight injustice is also preparation of Civil Servant.In 48-52nd BPSC first judgment was to scrap the pre. exam but after appeal it got reversed.So fight when there is something wrong. Judiciary,experts, BPSC counsel are paid to carry out their job properly.No one is above a single aspirant. Aspirant does not have to depend on their mercy.He or She is general public. He has the real power. Injustice should not be meted to any individual. Refer judgment in case of Judiciary exam. Even Supreme Court approved it.Every Civil Service aspirant has the maturity as reminded by our Amit.
hiii all expert commentrators...nice 2 here fm u all.....
here quesn is not bout success or failure....quesn is about rule of law and justice.
i ve 102 and after reevaluation 102 ...do u feel there is gr8 difference bet mine and ur marks ..so called successful aspirants who r teachig how 2 go about study and also telling in a way that they have been finally selected ....i ve written upsc mains also.....so it doesnt matter that i m not going 2 appear in bpsc mains.....and also wish all u passed ..get success in final xams also....
but when comes 2 justice....pls speak correct ..and say wrong what is wrong....and by going thru full judgement report.....i m quite sure that this is full of flaws ..at one point dear justice give rsn 4 not reducing cut off as unconvinience
2 bpsc also retaining 900 is not becoz it is for welfare of students rather 2 avoid further litigation..
so dear frnds.....v shud follow this case irrespective of our success / failure till last...
and yes all intelligent aspirants .u all pls dont give us ur fundas and better concentrate on mains prep....
Respected frnds!i said what i thought was good for my friends.but u know our system is not flawless and we have to survive in it.do what u want to do.my opinion is just mine.best of luck in either case.
ANY information regarding whether someone has approached the double bench or not?
53-55th BPSC PT judgement ke against double bench me LPA file ho chuka hai.
Link: http://www.rashtriyasahara.com/epapermain.aspx?queryed=13
Next hearing on 9th January 2012.
Bspc पीटी मामले में एकल पीठ के आदेश को चुनौती
पटना (एसएनबी)। बिहार लोक सेवा आयोग (बीपीएससी) की 53वीं से 55वीं प्रारंभिक परीक्षा को लेकर पटना उच्च न्यायालय के एकल पीठ के आदेश को दो सदस्यीय पीठ के समक्ष चुनौती दी गयी है। उक्त अपील पर नौ जनवरी को दो सदस्यीय पीठ के समक्ष सुनवाई होने की संभावना है। एकल पीठ ने बुधवार को ही अपना फैसला दिया था। उसके आदेश को कुछ असफल अभ्यर्थियों ने वरीय अधिवक्ता मनन कुमार मिश्र के माध्यम से चुनौती दी है और कहा कि नौ गलत प्रश्नों के अंक असफल अभ्यर्थियों के अंकों में जोड़ दिये जाएं तथा कट ऑफ वही रखा जाय। एकल पीठ ने अपने आदेश में कहा था कि असफल अभ्यर्थियों की कॉपियों का पुनमरूल्यांकन किया जाय एवं पुनमरूल्यांकन के बाद मेधा सूची में आने वाले अभ्यर्थियों को मुख्य परीक्षा में शामिल किया जाय। सफल 15137 उम्मीदवारों की उत्तरपुस्तिकाओं की जांच नहीं होगी। पीटी परीक्षा में करीब 15 हजार अभ्यर्थियों को लिखित परीक्षा के लिए सफल घोषित किया था। मामला 53वीं से 55वीं प्रारंभिक परीक्षा के पीटी रिजल्ट का
LPA has been accepted by the division bench of Hon’ble Chief Justice Miss Rekha Manharlal Doshit and Justice B P Verma against the judgement given by Mr Tripathi on Wednesday.
The division bench will sit on this matter on monday 9th January.
Conformed by officials from Patna High Court.
THKS DEAR FOR UR UPDATE
V LL WIN ....
koi jpsc ke result ko bhi phir se revise krbao na..plzzzzzzzzzzz
Yeah jo aaph logo ka attitude hai na, dik nahi hai. aap logo ko bpsc kai revise result ka wait karna chahiyeah tha. yeah MY WAY OR HIGHWAY WALA attitude thik nahi hai. aaph logo ko wait karna chahiyeah tha. agar double bench nai bhi wahi judgment diya to.. phir aaph kaya karange. un judges ko bhi bhala bura bolangai kaya??
MY WAY OR HIGHWAY WALA DIALOGUE
ye sab TV se sikhe hai...
congress ka bhasa bolte ho,
yaha LOKPAL pe discussion ho raha hai
yaha baccho ke future ka sawal hai aur aap VOCAB thik kar rahe hai mahasay,
agar double bench se nahi hua to SUPREME COURT jayenge....
ye jo upper wale janab MY WAY WAY AUR HIGH WAY bol rahe hai wo CONGRESSI hai...
jaise CONGRESS ka dalal kapil sibbal bolta tha ki winter session chal raha hai to ANDOLAN kyu???????
pata chala na sala sab mil kar parliament me LOKPAL BILL hi phar diya.
९ जनवरी को डबल बेंच की सुनवाई होगी क्या ?
BAHUT DUKH HAI AP SABKO SUNTE HUE...PEHLE AP K SATH SAHANUBHUTI THI KI GALAT HUA YE DECISION..AB BILKUL NAHI HOTA..GAALIYAN,AAROP-PRATYAROP,RACIAL AUR CASTE REMARK...AGAR IN SAB K SATH KOI ADMIN OFFICER BAN NA CHAHTA HAI TO SYSTEM KO KOI NAHI BACHA SAKTA...KISI JUSTICE,NETA YA APNE HI DESH K NAGRIK K SATH AISE BARTAV...BAHUT DUKH HAI KI AP ME SE KAL KAI LOG OFFICER V BAN JAYENGE...AGAR DECISION AANE K BAAD V AISE GANDE COMENTS KARNE WALO KA PT CLEAR HO JAYE TO YE EK AITIHASIK BHOOL HOGI...ACHHA HAI AISE LOG MAINS SE BAHAR RAHE
UPAR WALA COMMENT BILKUL SAHI HAI...HUMILITY IS THE MAIN PRINCIPLE TO BE AN ADMIN OFFICER....ACHHA HO AP SABHI COURT K JUDGEMENT KA INTEZAR KARE..AUR STUDIES KARE..ALL THE BEST
Aur agar supreme court me wahi judgement aaya to...bada chakkar hai bhai..
Justice delayed is Justice denied..this proverb is proved by the verdict given by Justice Tripathy. We do hope double bench comprising CJ will rectify the same and judgement given with malafide intention will be setaside. I wish to raise some points of double standard shown by the Justice Tripathy. He has given judgement not the justice.
Justice said BPSC is a constitutional body and is paying misdeed of so called expert.. but who empanelled them and on what basis..??
Justice said once a candidate has been declared successful, his ouster from the list of successful candidates will generate another kind of litigation which the BPSC wants to avoid in the interest of cutting down further delay in conducting the mains examination. They are therefore willing to retain them… why.. and on what basis. Hon.Tripathy ji has to ensure the right of equality laid down in our constitution. But he failed to do so and pronounced a meaningless verdict.Why he was so worried if number increases for the mains exam. He said lowering cutoff by 9 marks will not be justified due to increased in numbers.. but he has not given the data i.e. how many students will get pass to sit in the mains. He praised BPSC for maintaining 10% in giving PT result and saying that Judicial PT case in the judgment relied by the petitioners which is the case of Akshey Lal Pandit v. state the Court decided to reduce the minimum eligibility by 25 marks to sit for the main examination but that was based in the given facts and circumstances and taking into consideration that the total number of applicants for the vacancy of judicial officers was about 21000 only but in the present case the number of applicants runs into lakhs and such an approach would frustrate the very object of holding a preliminary examination to weed out the non-serious students from the contention.
But Mr.Justice failed to consider that theDouble Bench didn’t bother about the number, that’s why 5155 candidates out of 21000 qualified for mains which is scheduled to be held in this month. Although this is the rule if no. of candidate is more than 40 thousand then PT will be taken. Then why BPSC taken PT for Judiciary exam. So, it is clear that number game is not the problem for BPSC but Mr.Tripathy has taken so many care of it. In his own word, he tried to end the further scope of litigation by excluding selected candidates copy for fresh evaluation. But this is not the justice. He accepted negative approach on the basis of old citation Ganesh Yadav v.state 1995(2-PLJR 170 instead of Akshey Lal Pandit Judicial case and approval of Supreme Court on the same. And compelled the student to struggle for the justice.
I also point out one fact about qs no.134 of B set.. In India, per capita consumption of energy in 1994 was.. ans is D (pl. refer Dutta & Sundaram p.36)
So, by lowering cut off by 9 marks in each category is the last solution which will be accepted by all section, otherwise litigation will be further stretched…
I wish to suggest successful candidates, pl. leave this blog and focus on your studies. Now u have ample time to prepare and revise it thrice..
BEST OF LUCK TO ALL JUSTICE SEEKER..
Justice delayed is Justice denied..this proverb is proved by the verdict given by Justice Tripathy. We do hope double bench comprising CJ will rectify the same and judgement given with malafide intention will be setaside. I wish to raise some points of double standard shown by the Justice Tripathy. He has given judgement not the justice.
Justice said BPSC is a constitutional body and is paying misdeed of so called expert.. but who empanelled them and on what basis..??
Justice said once a candidate has been declared successful, his ouster from the list of successful candidates will generate another kind of litigation which the BPSC wants to avoid in the interest of cutting down further delay in conducting the mains examination. They are therefore willing to retain them… why.. and on what basis. Hon.Tripathy ji has to ensure the right of equality laid down in our constitution. But he failed to do so and pronounced a meaningless verdict.Why he was so worried if number increases for the mains exam. He said lowering cutoff by 9 marks will not be justified due to increased in numbers.. but he has not given the data i.e. how many students will get pass to sit in the mains. He praised BPSC for maintaining 10% in giving PT result and saying that Judicial PT case in the judgment relied by the petitioners which is the case of Akshey Lal Pandit v. state the Court decided to reduce the minimum eligibility by 25 marks to sit for the main examination but that was based in the given facts and circumstances and taking into consideration that the total number of applicants for the vacancy of judicial officers was about 21000 only but in the present case the number of applicants runs into lakhs and such an approach would frustrate the very object of holding a preliminary examination to weed out the non-serious students from the contention.
But Mr.Justice failed to consider that theDouble Bench didn’t bother about the number, that’s why 5155 candidates out of 21000 qualified for mains which is scheduled to be held in this month. Although this is the rule if no. of candidate is more than 40 thousand then PT will be taken. Then why BPSC taken PT for Judiciary exam. So, it is clear that number game is not the problem for BPSC but Mr.Tripathy has taken so many care of it. In his own word, he tried to end the further scope of litigation by excluding selected candidates copy for fresh evaluation. But this is not the justice. He accepted negative approach on the basis of old citation Ganesh Yadav v.state 1995(2-PLJR 170 instead of Akshey Lal Pandit Judicial case and approval of Supreme Court on the same. And compelled the student to struggle for the justice.
I also point out one fact about qs no.134 of B set.. In India, per capita consumption of energy in 1994 was.. ans is D (pl. refer Dutta & Sundaram p.36)
So, by lowering cut off by 9 marks in each category is the last solution which will be accepted by all section, otherwise litigation will be further stretched…
I wish to suggest successful candidates, pl. leave this blog and focus on your studies. Now u have ample time to prepare and revise it thrice..
BEST OF LUCK TO ALL JUSTICE SEEKER..
Justice delayed is Justice denied..this proverb is proved by the verdict given by Justice Tripathy. We do hope double bench comprising CJ will rectify the same and judgement given with malafide intention will be setaside. I wish to raise some points of double standard shown by the Justice Tripathy. He has given judgement not the justice.
Justice said BPSC is a constitutional body and is paying misdeed of so called expert.. but who empanelled them and on what basis..??
Justice said once a candidate has been declared successful, his ouster from the list of successful candidates will generate another kind of litigation which the BPSC wants to avoid in the interest of cutting down further delay in conducting the mains examination. They are therefore willing to retain them… why.. and on what basis. Hon.Tripathy ji has to ensure the right of equality laid down in our constitution. But he failed to do so and pronounced a meaningless verdict.Why he was so worried if number increases for the mains exam. He said lowering cutoff by 9 marks will not be justified due to increased in numbers.. but he has not given the data i.e. how many students will get pass to sit in the mains. He praised BPSC for maintaining 10% in giving PT result and saying that Judicial PT case in the judgment relied by the petitioners which is the case of Akshey Lal Pandit v. state the Court decided to reduce the minimum eligibility by 25 marks to sit for the main examination but that was based in the given facts and circumstances and taking into consideration that the total number of applicants for the vacancy of judicial officers was about 21000 only but in the present case the number of applicants runs into lakhs and such an approach would frustrate the very object of holding a preliminary examination to weed out the non-serious students from the contention.
But Mr.Justice failed to consider that theDouble Bench didn’t bother about the number, that’s why 5155 candidates out of 21000 qualified for mains which is scheduled to be held in this month. Although this is the rule if no. of candidate is more than 40 thousand then PT will be taken. Then why BPSC taken PT for Judiciary exam. So, it is clear that number game is not the problem for BPSC but Mr.Tripathy has taken so many care of it. In his own word, he tried to end the further scope of litigation by excluding selected candidates copy for fresh evaluation. But this is not the justice. He accepted negative approach on the basis of old citation Ganesh Yadav v.state 1995(2-PLJR 170 instead of Akshey Lal Pandit Judicial case and approval of Supreme Court on the same. And compelled the student to struggle for the justice.
I also point out one fact about qs no.134 of B set.. In India, per capita consumption of energy in 1994 was.. ans is D (pl. refer Dutta & Sundaram p.36)
So, by lowering cut off by 9 marks in each category is the last solution which will be accepted by all section, otherwise litigation will be further stretched…
I wish to suggest successful candidates, pl. leave this blog and focus on your studies. Now u have ample time to prepare and revise it thrice..
BEST OF LUCK TO ALL JUSTICE SEEKER..
Bpsc should fix no of students clearg pt shud d 13times of d seats as done by upsc. all failed students shud conc on thr studies so as to avoid this mess. otherwise for every exam thy need a lawyer.
Post a Comment