Patna, Jan, 6: It seems that the legal battle not going to end sooner for the aspirants of BPSC 53-55th Civil services examination as dissatisfied students approached with their LPA to the division bench comprising Hon’ble Chief Justice Miss Rekha Manharlal Doshit and Justice B P Verma against the judgment given by Justice A K Tripathi on Wednesday.
The matter will be listed in front of division bench on Jan-9.Students approached to bench through senior advocate Manan Kumar Mishra with the prayer that nine marks will be added in the marks of unsuccessful student and cut off will remain same and then result will be published.
Earlier Justice Tripathi has directed the BPSC to exempt the successful candidate and evaluate the papers of students as per new model answer provided by the 2nd expert committee and publish some result.
23 comments:
Chalo chance hai justice hoga.Ya again new expert panel will delete further questions. Most likely
Kuch nahi hoga yahan do do tripathi hai 9th ko hi quash kar dega..
Tropathi ne 21 point agenda likh deaya hai bada kadak verdict hai..
No flaws left.....
Hope for the best
Pass walo (915) ko jitne number ka benefit diya ja rha utne number ka benefit fail walo ko bhi milna chahiye ? yeh nahi ki aap cut-off 104 ke jagah 103 kar fail walo ki copy ka evalution kar de.
Decision ko thik se padhe...
cut off will reduced some point because then only it will became level playing field.
I thing few thousand result will be declared soon by JPSC based on new answers.
In judicial services exam the division bench took less than 2months in delivering judgement;
Details are as given below;
Case No.: CWJC-5300/2011
Filed on: 17 Mar 2011 District: PATNA
AKSHEY LAL PANDIT Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
Subject;SELECTION , GAZETTED SER.(JUDICIAL SERVICES)
DISPOSED ON 11 May 2011
Petitioner's Advocate:SURESH MISHRA
Respondent Advocate:DEVENDRA KR SINHA
DISPOSAL ON: 11 May 2011
In the Court of Before :- The Chief Justice & Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran
So in our case judgement should come by the end of March.
it will be rejected in first hearing
rakesh jee ye case to supreme court tak gaya tha.
lagta hai march ki jagah sep-2012 hona chahiye...
my dear friend this case is already accepted by the double bench for hearing so no matter of rejection an all...
judgement will come surely if not then will move to supreme court..
if u r in qualified list then be sure that will meet in mains and finally u will be out from the final list...
The demand is irrational...
BPSC cant take mains of 50k student...
then no need of PT...and mains paper will be checked till 2020....
mri chinta na kare ...i got 115 marks...apni soche..
9th ko sham me apse bat hogi
apne 115 marks ko mahoday mains me add kar liye kya????
lekin sayad aapko pata nahi ye 115 bhi aapko kam padega...
best of luck....
LAGTA HAI BHAI SUCCESSFUL BACCCHO ME DAR PAIDA HO GAYA HAI...
HA HA HAAAAA.....
MAI BHI AISE SAFAL HI HU LEKIN JUDGEMENT KE LIYE UNKE SATH HU AKHIR SABHI TO APNE BHAI HI HAI...
uper wale sahab ko jab 115 marks aaya hai to iss blog pe kyu latke hue hai..
JPSC pt cancelled...
U guys know a interesting thing behind d result...........
it is heard that Justice Tripathi's daughter has also been qualified for Mains but with only exact cut off marks....
A very good comment:
I hope it comes! The Chief Justice is perhaps more knowledgeable.What’s the use in killing time? More so when the type of knowledge these experts have can easily be predicted.They are going by the mass appeal and using hit and trial method to decide whether the questions are to be deleted or not. At one instance they are going by N.C.E.R.T. source and discarding reference books. Example in the case of question related to mineral. I do not understand what is their level of knowledge and judgment! Justice Tripathi was so confused that while summing up he discarded authenticity of N.C.E.R.T, even though he is satisfied with these bunch of experts. At once he came to conclusion that Commission is doing excellent work no matter how the numbers come but Commission is taking 10% of total appeared. In praising the Commission he is indirectly putting the blame on these different panel of experts. In the meantime real sufferers are only aspirants ( being tagged as successful and unsuccessful) What a shame and mockery! Hope for the best at the earliest.
EK DUSRE KO GAALIYAN,JUSTICE AUR NETAON KO GALIYAN,CASTE AUR RACIAL REMARKS,AAROP-PRATYAAROP...IS SITE K LAST BPSC WALE POST ME YEHI SAB COMMENTS DIKH RAHE HAIN..FIR V YE JID KI MAIN BHRASTACHAR K KHILAF HU AUR ADMIN OFFICER BAN NA CHAHTA HU FIR TO BADA DUKH AUR SHARM MEHSUS HAI YE KEHTE HUE KI BIHAR KA BHAGWAN MALIK HAI..ITNA HANGAMA KYUN..SUNA THA HUMILITY JARURI HAI EK ACHHE ADMIN OFFICER ME..
AGAR AISE LOG REVISED RESULT K BAD V PT SE BAHAR RAHE TO ACHHA HOGA..
ADMIN SE REQUEST HAI AISE BEHOODE COMENTS KO DELETE KAREN
PLZ HAVE PATIENCE AUR JUDICIARY KO APNA KAM KARNE DE
JPSC KA NEXT HEARING 10 JAN. KO HAI.
Justice delayed is Justice denied..this proverb is proved by the verdict given by Justice Tripathy. We do hope double bench comprising CJ will rectify the same and judgement given with malafide intention will be setaside. I wish to raise some points of double standard shown by the Justice Tripathy. He has given judgement not the justice. Because he has given verdict for 52nd -55th instead of 53rd-55th BPSC PT.. what a joke..
Justice said BPSC is a constitutional body and is paying misdeed of so called expert.. but who empanelled them and on what basis..??
Justice said once a candidate has been declared successful, his ouster from the list of successful candidates will generate another kind of litigation which the BPSC wants to avoid in the interest of cutting down further delay in conducting the mains examination. They are therefore willing to retain them… why.. and on what basis. Hon.Tripathy ji has to ensure the right of equality laid down in our constitution. But he failed to do so and pronounced a meaningless verdict.Why he was so worried if number increases for the mains exam. He said lowering cutoff by 9 marks will not be justified due to increased in numbers.. but he has not given the data i.e. how many students will get pass to sit in the mains. He praised BPSC for maintaining 10% in giving PT result and saying that Judicial PT case in the judgment relied by the petitioners which is the case of Akshey Lal Pandit v. state the Court decided to reduce the minimum eligibility by 25 marks to sit for the main examination but that was based in the given facts and circumstances and taking into consideration that the total number of applicants for the vacancy of judicial officers was about 21000 only but in the present case the number of applicants runs into lakhs and such an approach would frustrate the very object of holding a preliminary examination to weed out the non-serious students from the contention.
But Mr.Justice failed to consider that theDouble Bench didn’t bother about the number, that’s why 5155 candidates out of 21000 qualified for mains which is scheduled to be held in this month. Although this is the rule if no. of candidate is more than 40 thousand then PT will be taken. Then why BPSC taken PT for Judiciary exam. So, it is clear that number game is not the problem for BPSC but Mr.Tripathy has taken so many care of it. In his own word, he tried to end the further scope of litigation by excluding selected candidates copy for fresh evaluation. But this is not the justice. He accepted negative approach on the basis of old citation Ganesh Yadav v.state 1995(2-PLJR 170 instead of Akshey Lal Pandit Judicial case and approval of Supreme Court on the same. And compelled the student to struggle for the justice.
I also point out one fact about qs no.134 of B set.. In India, per capita consumption of energy in 1994 was.. ans is D (pl. refer Dutta & Sundaram p.36)
So, by lowering cut off by 9 marks in each category is the last solution which will be accepted by all section, otherwise litigation will be further stretched…
I wish to suggest successful candidates, pl. leave this blog and focus on your studies. Now u have ample time to prepare and revise it thrice..
BEST OF LUCK TO ALL JUSTICE SEEKER..
Judgement given by Mr. Tripathy needs appreciation in the light of the massive strength of the candidate and Quality of the examination..
What does Justice Tripathy means by serious candidate? It is not so that serious candidate means only 10% of total appeared.Any layman can say that for 3 years backlog of BPSC THERE CAN BE MORE THAN 50000 SERIOUS CANDIDATE
It is true that the daughter of Mr. Tripathi has qualified in PT with 104 marks. It is also known that Mr. Tripathi was counsel of BPSC at one time.
uper wale sahab ko jab 115 marks aaya hai to iss blog pe kyu latke hue hai..
Post a Comment