Saturday, July 16, 2011

Leadership an Introduction


Leadership is an integral part of management and plays a vital role in managerial operations. If there is any single factor that differentiates between successful and unsuccessful organizations, it could be considered as dynamic and effective leadership. Perhaps, it would be a valid assumption to state that the major cause of most business failures would be ineffective leadership.

All managers, in a way, are business leaders, even though management primarily relies on formal position power to influence people whereas leadership stems from a social influence process.

However, management is an integral component of technical as well as social processes. A question which many a novice in Management ask and experts echo is whether “Manager” and
“Leader” is synonymous terms.

 Are the functions of the ‘Manager’ the same as those of the Leader? 

Are the two roles the same? 

Are they different? If they are – are there or rather aren’t there areas of functional similarities? To what extent do they differ in direction and/or magnitude? 

Before attempting to answer the million dollar question “Are all leaders managers or are all managers leaders?

It will be prudent to clarify the concepts of leadership and management. An extremely simplistic yet profoundly meaningful definition of leadership states it as the
“Phenomenon of one person influencing the thinking or  action or both of another person or groups of persons”.

Management has been defined in various ways by different authors. In fact, there exist almost as many definitions for management as there are authors on the topic. There is neither the scope nor the need to examine the various definitions of management in this discussion. However, two of them may be considered.

One of the earliest universally accepted definitions of management considered it as the “process of getting things done through and by people”. One of the modern definitions of management describes it as “the process of ensuring effectiveness and efficiency in achieving goals or objectives”.

From the above discussion, it is clear that whenever one influences the thinking or action or both of another person or a group, he/she is a leader and the phenomenon of leadership exists. This is so irrespective of what the “influence” aims or achieves. Even if the followers are “influenced” for some antisocial activities, the phenomenon involved is leadership and the one exhibiting it is a leader.

Managers have to influence their “people” for achieving organizational objectives, which, we assume, to be morally right and legally straight. So, all managers have a leadership role to play. But all that every leader does may not be very “Managerial”.

In short, all managers are leaders, but all leaders need not necessarily be managers. It should be remembered that this statement is made considering the roles of “leaders” and “managers” and not with reference to any individual with a managerial title or acceptance as a leader.
Categories of leaders: Based on the functions they perform, leaders can be classified into:

(i) Entrepreneurial
(ii) Administrative and

(iii) Political

(i) Entrepreneurial Leaders: As the term indicates, these are leaders who build organizations; these institution builders perform the tasks of initiation and structuring. They organize the required resources and put them in to effective and efficient use to create institutions of various sizes, nature and scope eg. Trade unions,  hospitals, schools, colleges, places of worship, cultural organizations etc.

Entrepreneurial leaders are highly motivated self starters who can get along reasonably well with a wide range of people with whom they can co-operate and from whom they can get co-operation. They will not be dispirited with setbacks and will not take “no” for an answer.
(ii) Administrative leaders: These are leaders whose performance will be at its peak when they are put in charge of running organizations they work for the maintenance and growth of the organizations; they plan, organize, staff, direct and control the organizations which may be expected to “safe” in their hands. They ensure that right men occupy right positions and that tasks are carried out effective and efficiently. 

They undertake environmental scanning and do SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis, based on which they define and redefine the mission of their organizations, set targets and objectives and formulate policies and strategies. They have a clear idea of what the organization should be at present and where it should be in the future.
(iii) Political leaders: By “political leaders” are meant those who act as representatives or spokesmen of their groups and strive for the redressal of the grievances of their groups in general and its members in particular. Many of them act on an ‘ad hoc’ basis not being very visible normally but appearing on the scene all of a sudden when a problem crops up, the tackling of which requires their attention. They may even leave the scene once the issue has been settled.


Friday, July 15, 2011

BPSC Decleares Result of 53rd to 55th PT Examination 2011

Patna, July, 15: Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) has released the most awaited preliminary examination result today. The examination was held on 17,04,2011 at 438 center spread in 38 different districts across the state.

Total 133698 students participated in the examination among them 15137 declared eligible for the mains examination.

In the total result 7767 are from general category, 2272 schedule cast, 134 scheduled tribes, 2561 from most backward cast,1686 backward class,450 from backward class women and 136 from physically handicap category. The result is available on the Commission web site (http://www.bpsc.bih.nic.in/).

The information about the mains examination will be separately released by the Commission in coming week.
As per PPSC release cut off of the students are as follows.
General=104
Backward Class =100
Most Backward Class=93
Women from Backward class=90
Scheduled Cast=86
Scheduled Tribes=86

Aditya-1 an Ambitious Solar Mission of ISRO


India prime space organization ISRO is working on India's first Indian space based Solar Coronagraph to study solar Corona in visible and near IR bands.

The launch of the Aditya-1 mission will be scheduled during the next high solar activity period (2012-13).

The main objectives of this mission is to study the Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) and consequently the crucial physical parameters for space weather such as the coronal magnetic field structures, evolution of the coronal magnetic field etc.

The Aditya-1 project will provide completely new information on the velocity fields and their variability in the inner corona having an important bearing on the unsolved problem of heating of the corona would be obtained.

GAGAN an Indian GPRS System by ISRO


The Government of India under Ministry of Civil Aviation has decided to implement an indigenous Satellite-Based Regional GPS Augmentation System also known as Space-Based Augmentation System (SBAS) as part of the Satellite-Based Communications, Navigation and Surveillance (CNS)/Air Traffic Management (ATM) plan for civil aviation.

The Indian SBAS system has been given an acronym GAGAN - GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation. A national plan for satellite navigation including implementation of Technology Demonstration System (TDS) over the Indian air space as a proof of concept has been prepared jointly by Airports Authority of India (AAI) and ISRO. 

TDS was successfully completed during 2007 by installing eight Indian Reference Stations (INRESs) at eight Indian airports and linked to the Master Control Center (MCC) located near Bangalore. 

The next major milestone in GAGAN is the conduct of PSAT (Preliminary System Acceptance Testing) which has been successfully completed in Dec 2010. The first GAGAN navigation payload is slated on GSAT-8 which was launched on May 21, 2011. The second GAGAN payload is scheduled to be launched on GSAT-10 in the first quarter of 2012. The third GAGAN payload is planned on another GEO satellite.

Source ISRO

Rebekah Brooks resignes from her Office.

London, July,15:After a scandal over phone hacking hit the company and News Corp's  the Chief Executive of News International  Rebekah Brooks has resigned.

Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal,is the largest shareholder in News Corp after the media king Murdoch.

Rebekah Brooks, who put the foundation of News International as a secretary before editing the News of the World and The Sun, sent an email to News International today announcing her resignation from the house.

“As chief executive of the company, I feel a deep sense of responsibility for the people we have hurt and I want to reiterate how sorry I am for what we now know to have taken place,” she wrote.

“I have believed that the right and responsible action has been to lead us through the heat of the crisis. However my desire to remain on the bridge has made me a focal point of the debate."

“This is now detracting attention from all our honest endeavors to fix the problems of the past. Therefore I have given Rupert and James Murdoch my resignation. While it has been a subject of discussion, this time my resignation has been accepted."

Rebekah Brooks earlier offered to resign after few details of phone hacking of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler and victims of the July 7 terrorist bombings sparked in media.

She also praised the Rupert’s wisdom, kindness and thanks him for his incisive advice in her career. She wrote. "I would like to thank them both for their support.”