Monday, September 13, 2010

MTV Video Music Awards (VMA 2010) nominees are?

Sunday night could be the night of Lady Gaga, because the 24-year-old has 13 nominations at the MTV Video Music Awards in Los Angeles. This is the record in the history of the music awards. Also, rapper Eminem sits well in the pools, and he is one of the favorite nominees with eight nominations. According to the announcement, he will inaugurate the show, which also expects appearances from other stars such as Kanye West, Mary J Blige. Lady Gaga is nominated, among others, in the categories for pop video, video of the year and best video of an artist, while Eminem with “Not Afraid” could get the award for best video of the year and best hip-hop Video.

Among the Best new talents nominated are Justin Bieber, Kesha, Jason Derulo, Nicki Minaj, and the group Broken Bells. And in the category of best dance video is also included along with reggaeton star Pitbull, Enrique Iglesias. Their single “I Like It” will face “Bad Romance” by Lady Gaga. It is the twenty-seventh time that these awards are given at a ceremony, and on this occasion, it will be moderated by comic Chelsea Handler. Last year, the R & B diva BeyoncĂ© took the video of the year award with her song “Single Ladies”, while Janet Jackson paid an emotional tribute to her brother Michael Jackson, who died a few months earlier. The story of the night, which made first pages, had the rapper Kanye West as leading man, when he blurted out to Taylor Swift that Beyonce deserved, more than her, the prize for best female video, which had been given to the country singer. When BeyoncĂ© finally won the prize for best video of the year, she called on stage Taylor Swift and she gave her the word.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

For Indian Stock market crash is inevitable…

For Indian Stock market crash is inevitable…

Indian equity has outperformed the global peers and became best performing market for the year by giving 6% return till august 2010 and this performance came up due to the consistent pumping of money by foreign funds .Global investment managers were in search of growth pockets to invest the money after the financial crisis to find best geography for the growth. The obvious choice was emerging markets however in emerging markets India was certainly the winner due to its growing GDP and consumption story so Indian market have received 60,329 crores of fund till September 2010.

Month

FII

DII

Jan

-302.9

-1,311.10

Feb

2,113.50

-697.4

Mar

18,833.60

3,806.40

Apr

9,764.50

1,616.50

May

-8,629.90

98.7

Jun

10,244.60

-1,092.50

Jul

17,120.60

-4,404.80

Aug

11,185.30

-3,169.60

The domestic mutual funds were the net seller in same tome by taking out 5151 crore between Januarys to September in the same period may was the only month when domestic funds were buyer by putting mere 98 crore in market however FII investment was positive in every month except January and may

Significant amount of money finds their way in developed market economy however those markets are flat or negative at this point of time.

FIG: FII and DII investment

Festive seasons are around the corner and funds have habit to reward their investors near Christmas so the FII profit booking is bound to come .Fundamentally Indian market is standing on the one leg because domestic funds and retail investors are sitting sideline while FII are consistent in the buying side when they turn negative the scenario will be bearish .Foreign funds don’t have option because only in emerging market they are in profit so they will sell some of their holdings in coming month precisely by October 2010.

Global perspective:

Following big losses for developed world equities in August, the rally was to be expected, because global markets were technically oversold. We are now entering what are normally the worst two months for markets and we will see new lows hit in October, at which point the market will discount the prospect of the mid-term elections in US ,in euro zone credit problem is still persisting Ireland is looking to spread their problem soon .

The indication has been coming from the bond market, which last month began to tell us there is really bad news out there. Following substantial buying in August, we have seen some selling but this will not last long enough.


Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Global market statistics in august.


US INDEX

JULY CLOSE

AUG HIGH

AUG CLOSE

%GAIN /LOSS

Dow Jones

10466

10698

10014

-4.30

NASQAQ

2254

2305

2104

-6.21

S&P 500

1101

1127

1049

-4.72

American markets were worst performing market in august, series of bad economic news propel the selloff at the wall street and the august emerged as the worst month for equity market in USA. Dowjone industrial average lost 4.30% of their value, NASDAQ composite lost 6.21% due to selloff in the technology sector, and S&P 500 lost 4.72% .There was only seven trading session when market went up.

EURO ZONE

JULY CLOSE

AUG HIGH

AUG CLOSE

%GAIN /LOSS

FTSE 100

5258

5410

5225

-0.62

CAC

3643

3777

3490

-4.19

DAX

6147

6351

5925

-3.61

Euro zone contributed similar manner as American indices here FTSE 100 was the best performer in the pack who lost slightly more than half percent while CAC of France lost -4.19% and DAX of Germany lost -3.61% in august only.

ASIA

JULY CLOSE

AUG HIGH

AUG CLOSE

% GAIN /LOSS

NIKKI

9537

9694

8824

-7.47

STRAIT TIMES

2987

3014

2950

-1.23

HANG SANG

21029

21294

20536

-2.34

SHANGHAI

2637

2687

2638

0.03

Asian market performance in august were better than developed world although NIKKI of japan tumble 7.47% while Hansang LOST 2.43% and strait times lost -1.23% however Shanghai composite closed flat in august.

INDIAN MARKET

JULY CLOSE

AUG HIGH

AUG CLOSE


SENSEX

17868

18401

17971

0.57

C&X NIFTY

5367

5543

5402

0.65

Indian market emerged as the winner in the September where all the market were crumbling in the august the Indian indices kisses their 31 month high although due profit booking lost their most of the gain in spite of this market able to close in green for the month where most of the market closed deep in red.

Amida research desk

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

How to analyse risk involved in investment...









There are five main indicators of investment risk that relate to the analysis of stocks, bonds and mutual fund portfolios. They are alpha,beta,r-squired standard deviation and the Sharpe. These statistical measures are historical predictors of investment risk/volatility and are all major components of Modern portfolio theory (MPT). The MPT is a standard financial and academic methodology used for assessing the performance of equity, fixed-income and mutual fund investments by comparing them to market benchmarks.

All of these risk measurements are intended to help investors determine the reward parameters of their investments. In this article, we'll give a brief explanation of each of these commonly used indicators.

1. Alpha
Alpha is a measure of an investment's performance on a risk-adjusted basis. It takes the volatility (price risk) of a security or fund portfolio and compares its risk-adjusted performance to a benchmark index. The excess return of the investment relative to the return of the benchmark index is its "alpha".

Simply stated, alpha is often considered to represent the value that a portfolio manager adds or subtracts from a fund portfolio's return. A positive alpha of 1.0 means the fund has outperformed its benchmark index by 1%. Correspondingly, a similar negative alpha would indicate an underperformance of 1%. For investors, the more positive an alpha is, the better it is.

2. Beta
Beta, also known as the "beta coefficient," is a measure of the volatility,or systematic risk of a security or a portfolio in comparison to the market as a whole. Beta is calculated using regression analysis, and you can think of it as the tendency of an investment's return to respond to swings in the market. By definition, the market has a beta of 1.0. Individual security and portfolio values are measured according to how they deviate from the market.

A beta of 1.0 indicates that the investment's price will move in lock-step with the market. A beta of less than 1.0 indicates that the investment will be less volatile than the market, and, correspondingly, a beta of more than 1.0 indicates that the investment's price will be more volatile than the market. For example, if a fund portfolio's beta is 1.2, it's theoretically 20% more volatile than the market.

Conservative investors looking to preserve capital should focus on securities and fund portfolios with low betas, whereas those investors willing to take on more risk in search of higher returns should look for high beta investments.

3. R-Squared
R-Squared is a statistical measure that represents the percentage of a fund portfolio's or security's movements that can be explained by movements in a benchmark index. For fixed-income securities and their corresponding mutual funds, the benchmark is the US Treasury bills and, likewise with equities and equity funds, the benchmark is the S&P 500.

R-squared values range from 0 to 100. According to Morningstar a mutual fund with an R-squared value between 85 and 100 has a performance record that is closely correlated to the index. A fund rated 70 or less would not perform like the index.

Mutual fund investors should avoid actively managed funds with high R-squared ratios, which are generally criticized by analysts as being "closet" Index Fund In these cases, why pay the higher fees for so-called professional management when you can get the same or better results from an index fund.

4. Standard Deviation
Standard deviation measures the dispersion of data from its mean. In plain English, the more that data is spread apart, the higher the difference is from the norm. In finance, standard deviation is applied to the annual return on investment of an investment to measure its volatility (risk). A volatile stock would have a high standard deviation. With mutual funds, the standard deviation tells us how much the return on a fund is deviating from the expected returns based on its historical performance.

5. Sharpe Ratio
Developed by Nobel laureate economist William Sharpe, this ratio measures risk-adjusted performance. It is calculated by subtracting the risk free rate of return from the rate of return for an investment and dividing the result by the investment's standard deviation of its return.

The Sharpe ratio tells investors whether an investment's returns are due to smart investment decisions or the result of excess risk. This measurement is very useful because although one portfolio or security can reap higher returns than its peers, it is only a good investment if those higher returns do not come with too much additional risk. The greater an investment's Sharpe ratio, the better its risk-adjusted performance.

Conclusion
Many investors tend to focus exclusively on investment return, with little concern for investment risk. The five risk measures we have just discussed can provide some balance to the risk-return equation. The good news for investors is that these indicators are calculated for them and are available on several financial websites, as well as being incorporated into many investment research reports. As useful as these measurements are, keep in mind that when considering a stock, bond, or mutual fund investment, volatility risk is just one of the factors you should be considering that can affect the quality of an investment.

source:Investopedia.com

There are five main indicators of investment risk that relate to the analysis of stocks, bonds and mutual fund portfolios. They are alpha,beta,r-s standard deviation and the Sharpe. These statistical measures are historical predictors of investment risk/volatility and are all major components of Modern portfolio theory (MPT). The MPT is a standard financial and academic methodology used for assessing the performance of equity, fixed-income and mutual fund investments by comparing them to market benchmarks.

All of these risk measurements are intended to help investors determine the reward parameters of their investments. In this article, we'll give a brief explanation of each of these commonly used indicators.

1. Alpha
Alpha is a measure of an investment's performance on a risk-adjusted basis. It takes the volatility (price risk) of a security or fund portfolio and compares its risk-adjusted performance to a benchmark index. The excess return of the investment relative to the return of the benchmark index is its "alpha".

Simply stated, alpha is often considered to represent the value that a portfolio manager adds or subtracts from a fund portfolio's return. A positive alpha of 1.0 means the fund has outperformed its benchmark index by 1%. Correspondingly, a similar negative alpha would indicate an underperformance of 1%. For investors, the more positive an alpha is, the better it is.

2. Beta
Beta, also known as the "beta coefficient," is a measure of the volatility, or systematic risk, of a security or a portfolio in comparison to the market as a whole. Beta is calculated using regression analysis, and you can think of it as the tendency of an investment's return to respond to swings in the market. By definition, the market has a beta of 1.0. Individual security and portfolio values are measured according to how they deviate from the market.

A beta of 1.0 indicates that the investment's price will move in lock-step with the market. A beta of less than 1.0 indicates that the investment will be less volatile than the market, and, correspondingly, a beta of more than 1.0 indicates that the investment's price will be more volatile than the market. For example, if a fund portfolio's beta is 1.2, it's theoretically 20% more volatile than the market.

Conservative investors looking to preserve capital should focus on securities and fund portfolios with low betas, whereas those investors willing to take on more risk in search of higher returns should look for high beta investments.

3. R-Squared
R-Squared is a statistical measure that represents the percentage of a fund portfolio's or security's movements that can be explained by movements in a benchmark index. For fixed-income securities and their corresponding mutual funds, the benchmark is the U.S. Treasury Bill and, likewise with equities and equity funds, the benchmark is the S&P 500 Index.

R-squared values range from 0 to 100. According to Morningstar, a mutual fund with an R-squared value between 85 and 100 has a performance record that is closely correlated to the index. A fund rated 70 or less would not perform like the index.

Mutual fund investors should avoid actively managed funds with high R-squared ratios, which are generally criticized by analysts as being "closet" index funds. In these cases, why pay the higher fees for so-called professional management when you can get the same or better results from an index fund.

4. Standard Deviation
Standard deviation measures the dispersion of data from its mean. In plain English, the more that data is spread apart, the higher the difference is from the norm. In finance, standard deviation is applied to the annual rate of return of an investment to measure its volatility (risk). A volatile stock would have a high standard deviation. With mutual funds, the standard deviation tells us how much the return on a fund is deviating from the expected returns based on its historical performance.

5. Sharpe Ratio
Developed by Nobel laureate economist William Sharpe, this ratio measures risk-adjusted performance. It is calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate of return (U.S. Treasury Bond) from the rate of return for an investment and dividing the result by the investment's standard deviation of its return.

The Sharpe ratio tells investors whether an investment's returns are due to smart investment decisions or the result of excess risk. This measurement is very useful because although one portfolio or security can reap higher returns than its peers, it is only a good investment if those higher returns do not come with too much additional risk. The greater an investment's Sharpe ratio, the better its risk-adjusted performance.

Conclusion
Many investors tend to focus exclusively on investment return, with little concern for investment risk. The five risk measures we have just discussed can provide some balance to the risk-return equation. The good news for investors is that these indicators are calculated for them and are available on several financial websites, as well as being incorporated into many investment research reports. As useful as these measurements are, keep in mind that when considering a stock, bond, or mutual fund investment, volatility risk is just one of the factors you should be considering that can affect the quality of an investment